The Crisis of Currents: Between the Absence of Foundational Logic and the Drain of Energies
Over time, intellectual, philosophical, and religious schools have been divided between reformist, conservative, and moderate currents, generally moving within the space of interpretive frameworks dominating individuals and groups. In the absence of Foundational Logic capable of distinguishing between the fixed and the variable, these schools have entered into a state of confusion that produced hybrid forms such as the “religious liberal” or the “sectarian modernist”—pragmatic attempts at adaptation rather than coherent epistemological constructions. In the modern era, a modernist current has emerged within these schools, seeking to reshape the entire project according to the logic of modernity, even if that meant breaking away from its original foundations. This condition renders the project closer to a political movement, governed by the logic of the possible, compromises, and conflicts—rather than by a shared rationality. From here arises the crisis of currents: instead of energies being directed toward the development of the project, they are drained in internal battles.
